Deck Hub
Technical guidance · Composite floor decking · Multi-brand supply
Ranges coveredComFlor · MetFloor · Firth floor deck
Anchored toBS EN 1994-1-1 · SCI P300 · BCSA CoP 2014
StatusRev E · 07/10/2026

GN 00 · Why this portal exists

The answer to your decking question, with the standard it came from

Every page covers one topic: bearings, propping, stud spacing, surface flatness. Each is written for the person who has to act on it, and tied to the clause it comes from. No login, no PDF hunt.

For engineers: design rules with BS EN / SCI references you can cite in calcs and RFIs. For site teams: installation and concreting practice you can lift into a toolbox talk. For buyers: equivalent profiles across ComFlor, MetFloor and the Firth-rolled SMD range, so supply speed never traps the programme.

Quick span checker

Live tool · published table data
130 mm
Max unpropped span
at this exact depth
3.64 m
Deck weight0.10 kN/m²
Concrete volume (NWC)0.098 m³/m²
Wet slab + deck2.55 kN/m²
Dry slab + deck2.45 kN/m²
Min mesh at this depthA142
Propped potential~6.3 m

Need more than the table gives? These are standard published limits. More span, heavier point loads or extra reinforcement is often achievable with S450 steel, increased mesh, trough bars or fibre concrete. Before you change the frame, ask RMD for a site specific calculation and a specialist specification.

Send this case to RMD technical →

Live tool

Concrete volume and order calculator

Enter the pour area and deck details; get the net volume, the ponding allowance, and the loads for the temporary works check. Volumes reproduce the published tables for every profile.

130 mm
Order volume
(net + ponding)
56.0 m³
Net volume49.0 m³
Ponding allowance7.0 m³
Per m² (NWC)0.098 m³/m²
Wet slab load2.45 kN/m²
Dry slab load2.35 kN/m²
Deck steel on this pour5.1 t

Point loads, plant or heavy storage on this slab? The tables assume uniform loading. Concentrated loads need their own check, and often just a little extra reinforcement. Ask RMD before you commit; we run the site specific calculation.

Start where you stand

Four readers, four front doors

The full index is below, but most questions arrive wearing a hard hat or holding a calc pad. Pick your lane.

Guide index

Thirteen sections, one project lifecycle

Numbered like drawing sheets so you can cite a page in an email or RFI ("see Deck Hub 4.3") and it stays citable.

Product data

Three ranges, one informed decision

RMD supplies equivalent profiles from three manufacturers. The slab zone barely changes; availability, price and programme often do. Spans below are the published unpropped double span range across gauges at each profile's best tabulated slab depth, 60 min fire, 5.0 kN/m² total applied load.

Slab roleComFlor (Tata Steel)MetFloor (CMF)Firth (SMD profiles)
Re-entrant dovetail
flat soffit, services, fire
CF 51+
51 mm deep, 600 cover
3.09 to 3.88 m
MetFloor 55
55 mm deep, 600 cover
3.34 to 4.09 m
R51+
52 mm deep, 600 cover
2.89 to 3.74 m
60 mm trapezoidal
the all-rounder
CF 60
60 mm deep, 600 cover
3.64 to 4.65 m
MetFloor 60
60 mm deep, 600 cover
3.89 to 4.57 m
TR60+
60 mm deep, 1000 cover
3.46 to 4.24 m
80 mm trapezoidal
long span, fewer beams
CF 80
80 mm deep, 600 cover
3.71 to 4.64 m
MetFloor 80
80 mm deep, 600 cover
4.43 to 5.16 m
TR80+
80 mm deep, 600 cover
3.93 to 4.39 m
Shallow economy
nestable, tight access
CF 46
46 mm deep, 900 cover
2.97 to 3.26 m
No equivalent No equivalent
Deep long span
unpropped, any support type
CF 100
100 mm deep, 700 cover
4.01 to 4.59 m
No equivalent No equivalent

Small differences between brands come from geometry and table assumptions, not quality. Project design always governs. RMD quotes all three routes; lead time often decides. If the span you need is beyond every column, ask RMD: S450 grade, fibre and site specific design push these numbers.

Page pattern

What every guidance page looks like

Plain-English answer first, clause references beside it, key numbers pulled out, and a route to a human at the bottom. Here's GN 4.3 as a worked example.

GN 4.3 Temporary propping

What this page covers: when a deck span needs props before concreting, who designs them, and when they can come out.
Rev 1.1 · 06-07-2026
Refs: SCI P300 · TR75 · BS EN 1991-1-6

The short version

Most decked floors are designed unpropped; that is the point of composite construction. Props enter the picture on long spans, at large openings, and on cantilevers over 450 mm. If your layout drawing shows a chain-dotted zone marked "TP", that bay needs props before anyone pours.

The rules that matter

  • Props carry the wet-concrete dead load plus construction loads, checked at ULS. They are temporary works, designed by the temporary works engineer, not by RMD.
  • Bearers sit continuous across the bay on timbers at maximum 1.0 m centres, positioned, levelled and braced before the deck is laid. The design assumes zero deflection at the propped line.
  • Props stay in until the slab reaches 75% of its design strength. Striking early is the single most common propping failure we see quoted in disputes.
  • Propping and safety nets fight for the same space below the deck. Resolve the fall-arrest method for propped bays at planning stage, not on the morning of the pour.

Where RMD fits

Our layout drawings flag every propped zone and we'll give you the prop line loads from the deck design on request. The temporary works design itself stays with your engineer.

Need this answered for a live job? Send us the drawing and a decking engineer replies within one working day.

Ask RMD
PrototypeRMD Profiles Deck Hub, Rev E
Data sourcesPublished tables: TATA ComFlor · CMF MetFloor manual v1.7 · SMD Stockyards STA-1002/3/4
Checked againstBS EN 1994-1-1 · SCI P300 · BCSA CoP 2014
NoteIndicative tools. Final design by RMD technical
© 2026 RMD Profiles. All rights reserved. The text, page design, graphics and tool code on this page are the copyright of RMD Profiles and may not be reproduced, stored or transmitted without written permission. Manufacturer load and span data is reproduced from published literature for guidance and remains the copyright of the respective manufacturers. Tools are indicative only and do not constitute engineering design.